Saturday, July 23, 2016

A Review: Application of the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America: Some Evidence documented

Application of the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America: Some Evidence documented

Application of the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America: Some Evidence Documented

- A Review -

Compiled by Amelia Gora (2016)

The Kingdom of Hawaii was wrongfully, criminally plundered upon by a Nation who did treaty with our Sovereign, Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli who set up the Alodio/Ano Alodio System for his heirs and his people. To Aliens/foreigners he allowed a Fee Simple. Furthermore, he did not wish for foreigners to own his private lands.

"The Court ruled in favor of the British plaintiff, holding that the treaty removed any bar to recovery created by Virginia law. Justice Cushing wrote that under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty “overrules all State laws upon the subject.”33 The other Justices agreed on this point,34 including Justice Iredell, who dissented on other grounds.35 Although Marshall argued eloquently on behalf of the losing defendants,36 he never challenged the consensus view that under the Supremacy Clause, the treaty displaced any state law inconsistent with U.S. treaty obligations."

"The Court held that judicial action was the appropriate means to implement the treaty because the combination of the treaty and the Supremacy Clause obligated state courts to “execute” the U.S. treaty obligation by ordering American debtors to pay their debts to British creditors."

" Marshall’s speech set forth his views about the allocation of constitutional responsibility for treaty implementation among the three branches of the federal government.52 In brief, Marshall believed that all government officers have a duty to execute treaties, insofar as they can do so by acting within the scope of authority granted under domestic law."

Marshall explained this position as follows: “[The President] is charged to execute the laws. A treaty is declared to be a law. He must then execute a treaty, where he . . . possesses the means of executing it.”60 Since Article 27 had the force of law under the Supremacy Clause, and the President had a duty under Article II to execute the law, the President had a duty to execute Article 27, at least in cases where Congress had not specified some other mechanism for treaty implementation.

"Republicans also argued that Article 27 required judicial, not executive implementation.61 In response, Marshall emphasized the distinction between a case “carried before a court as an individual claim” and a case “brought before the Executive as a national demand.”62 The Robbins case was “in its nature a national demand made upon the nation. The parties were the two nations. They cannot come into court to litigate their claims, nor can a court

decide on them. Of consequence, the demand is not a case for judicial cognizance.”63 A treaty-related claim falls within the scope of judicial competence where parties “come into court, who can be reached by its process, and bound by its power . . . to which they are bound to submit.”64 Since the real parties in interest in the Robbins case were two sovereign powers, and they were not bound to submit to judicial authority, the case fell outside the scope of judicial competence."

"B. Application of the Two-Step Approach in Foster and Percheman In Foster v. Neilson, 90 Marshall penned the following words, which have come to be associated with the doctrine of non-self-executing treaties: Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department; and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule for the Court.91"

"Executory treaty provisions require the nation to undertake affirmative steps to fulfill its treaty commitments, whereas executed treaty provisions “require no further act to be done.”114"

"The Clause specifies that “all Treaties” are “the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”173 Read literally, the text seems to say that all treaties are directly binding on state governments. This interpretation is broadly consistent with the original understanding of the Supremacy Clause. Although commentators disagree about the original understanding, they generally agree that the Framers included treaties in the Supremacy Clause to make treaties binding on state government officers under domestic law.174 There are two problems, though, with a literal interpretation of the Supremacy Clause. First, the Constitution prohibits federal lawmakers from “commandeering” state legislatures or state executive officers.175"

"It is well established that “a State must afford to all individuals a meaningful opportunity to be heard if it is to fulfill the promise of the Due Process Clause.”208 Writing for the Court in 1876, Justice Field expressed the principle as follows: Wherever one is assailed in his person or his property, there he may defend, for the liability and the right are inseparable. This is a principle of natural justice, recognized as such by the common intelligence and conscience of all nations. A sentence of a court pronounced against a party without hearing him, or giving him an opportunity to be heard, is not a judicial determination of his rights, and is not entitled to respect in any other tribunal.209"

" Absent action by the federal political branches, though, the Supreme Court has a duty to apply the Supremacy Clause as written. Under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty is binding on state government officers if the treaty imposes non-discretionary duties on the United States under international law, state officers have the capacity to promote or hinder treaty performance, and application of treaty duties to state officers would not violate the anti-commandeering rule. The Clause applies both to treaties that delegate decisionmaking authority to international tribunals and those that do not. Whether, and in what circumstances, a treaty is judicially enforceable against state officers is a separate issue. This article does not analyze the myriad issues associated with judicial enforcement of treaties that are binding on state government officers under domestic law. However, the article does identify a narrow set of cases in which the Due Process Clause mandates judicial enforcement of treaties. When the state threatens to impose criminal sanctions on someone, and that person claims the sanction would violate a treaty-based, non-discretionary duty, the Due Process Clause requires a judicial hearing on the merits, provided the individual raises the argument at the first available opportunity in accordance with established procedural rules. State and federal judicial decisions in Medellin probably violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause."

Reference: http://www.harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/HLI103.pdf

REVIEW

The Supreme Court is mandated "to apply the Supremacy Clause as written" in all court cases in the Hawaiian Islands.

"Absent action by the federal political branches, though, the Supreme Court has a duty to apply the Supremacy Clause as written. Under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty is binding on state government officers if the treaty imposes non-discretionary duties on the United States under international law, state officers have the capacity to promote or hinder treaty performance, and application of treaty duties to state officers would not violate the anti-commandeering rule. The Clause applies both to treaties that delegate decisionmaking authority to international tribunals and those that do not. Whether, and in what circumstances, a treaty is judicially enforceable against state officers is a separate issue. This article does not analyze the myriad issues associated with judicial enforcement of treaties that are binding on state government officers under domestic law. However, the article does identify a narrow set of cases in which the Due Process Clause mandates judicial enforcement of treaties. When the state threatens to impose criminal sanctions on someone, and that person claims the sanction would violate a treaty-based, non-discretionary duty, the Due Process Clause requires a judicial hearing on the merits, provided the individual raises the argument at the first available opportunity in accordance with established procedural rules. State and federal judicial decisions in Medellin probably violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause."

The Courts, etc. from an Identity Theft basis/Sham set-up/a Non-government entity

Because the United States did premeditate the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, set up the Territory disregarding the Opposition to Annexation of Queen Liliuokalani and her subjects numbering 40,000, and with the aid of the Army, Navy, and Federal officials developed the Territory and falsely claimed that the the "Territory was the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii", the United States violated the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the the Supremacy Clause, violated their own citizens when they signed the illegal banker's Constitution, created a two government system called the United States, and the American Empire, instead of the United States of America, looted, pirated a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation and utilized monies, lands, assets, mineral rights, etc. for the purpose of Wars with other innocent nations...........the U.S., the bankers in the Hawaiian Islands needs to take their identity thieves, their pirates, current pirate operatives including the governor, judges, United States Minister of Interior, gun carrying Police officers, Sheriffs, Department of Land and Natural Resources officers, et. als. with them according to the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America.

Injuries were made on all non-treasonous kanaka maoli, Hawaii's Royal Families, and innocent subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Injuries includes genocide activities, the deliberate incarceration of land owners on Kalaupapa, leper colonies, introducing small pox into the populations, etc.

Alodio/Ano Alodio, Superior titles to lands are held by those kanaka maoli documented in the Mahele books, validated by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1848. Aliens were given Fee Simple/less than alodio/life interest only.

The United States of America paid for Fee Simple conveyances by those who had only Fee Simple titles or had no titles to convey.

The United States of America/United States/American Empire must pay rents, remove toxic containers such as the fuel storage buildings, etc. in Halawa Valley, Oahu, removal of depleted uranium materials, missiles, etc stored and used at Pohakuloa, Hawaii, Schofield Barracks, Wahiawa,Oahu, etc. and eventually face the Tribunals for all Nations who were wrongfully plundered upon through the funds gotten from the pirating of assets of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation for the purposes of Wars/Business of Wars.

The above is additional supporting evidence which is added to the following:

4:30
Karen Hudes - The Bank Of Hawaii Holds 170,000 Tons Of Gold

Schitt Report
1 year ago

7,831 views
Emmmmm, nope.
23:44
World Bank Whistleblower makes Startling Confession Karen Hudes

the jesuits' jungle
2 years ago

34,011 views
Karen Hudes exposes The World Bank. Source: Next News Network' channelhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJwJENSGnhE ...
23:25
Karen Hudes - World Bank in Collusion with the Jesuits.

the jesuits' jungle
2 years ago

29,231 views
Source: Greg Hunter' channel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHVgRgYdCsQ The Federal Reserve and the Bank for ...

18:46

No Treaty- No Law- No Land

2 years ago
3,086 views

A video about the present day plundering of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

10:41

Ohikilolo 00015

and many more films with Kilikina Kekumano

28:31
The Sovereignty Conversations Na Maka, Williamson Chang

S Britt
6 months ago

251 views
In this Episode we have a re-cap with Juanita and Professor Williamson Chang on the Department of the Interiorʻs Native ...
25:52
50th State Fraud - A Visit With Williamson Chang

Voices Of Truth - One-On-One With Hawai`iʻs Future
1 year ago

5,499 views
http://VoicesOfTruthTV.com - Imagine the surprise University Of Hawai`i Professor Williamson Chang got when he discovered the ...
31:36
Aloha ʻĀina Speaker Series: Hawaiian Independence & Governance ...

UH Kapiolani
2 months ago

94 views
Hawaiian Independence & Governance: A discussion of the past and future of the nation of Hawaiʻi. PART THREE: Professor ...
8:34

Tribunal 001

Amelia Gora

1 year ago

262 views

This is a brief summary of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina activities.,...we have been behind the scenes for a long time ...

Other references:

theiolani.blogspot.com read all 606 issues posted since 2006

http://mywebe.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037

aloha.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Landlord Lien /Legal Notice for the Iolani Palace, etc.

Iolani Palace: Rents Due; Picking Up the Pace: Royal Families Land Trust, and Other Important Matters of a Neutral

http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/u/us-hi_1.gif"/>

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZwXcWrQYVqsG..."/>

U.S. President Barrack Obama

Secretary of State

Judges, et. als. in the Hawaiian Islands

Many Interested others

Re:

Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Records/Legal Notice and Billing No. 2016-0617 Rents and Back Rents due for the Iolani Palace, Royal Patent 5695, Land Commission Award 247(5), 247(10), 247(2) etc. covering 10.6 acs. more or less, etc. from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, One of the Superior Alodio/Ano Alodio Title Owners of the Iolani Palace /Iolani Palace Grounds etc.

Greetings,

My name is Amelia Gora, one of the Royal Family members of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

Alodio/Ano Alodio lands are our legal claims.

The

U.S. National Register of Historic Places
U.S. National Historic Landmark Territory of Hawaii, the State of Hawaii, the City and County(ies)

are Not related to our Royal Families who have the prima facie documents of superior titles to many of the lands in the Hawaiian Islands.

Reference: 1851 Speech of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli regarding alodio and Fee Simple lands to Aliens, etc.; theiolani.blogspot.comhttp:myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037 etc.

This letter is to inform you that the lands of W.C. Lunalilo, Charles Kanaina et. als. has owners and rents and leases are due to King Lunalilo's Families who includes all of Kamehameha's, his children, stepchildren and his hanai/adopted children, Kalaniopuu's children/stepchildren, Kaumualii's children/stepchildren.

The children/stepchildren and hanai children of Kamehameha also became the children of Kalaimoku/ Kalanimoku who married Keopuolani, one of the wives of Kamehameha.

King Lunalilo/W.C. Lunalilo/William Charles Lunalilo's mother Auhea/Kekauluohi was married to both Kamehameha and Kamehameha II - Kauikeaouli which made her son William Lunalilo a sibling of all of Kamehameha's children/stepchildren and hanai/adopted children his siblings.

The Probate of Charles Kanaina left out the Kamehameha's because Charles Kanaina's wife Auhea/ Kekauluohi was left out of the Probate/disregarded/defrauded.

The interests of the Iolani Palace remains due to having interests through Bernice Pauahi Bishop who was awarded 2/9 interest; Ruth Keelikolani was awarded 1/9 interest; and Kanekolia (w) and others were also conveyed interests through the genealogies of Charles Kanaina who was the heir of King Lunalilo, his son.

Charles Kanaina was the heir of his son according to King Lunalilo's Probate.

Kamehameha's Children/Stepchildren, and Hanai Children's Interests

I, Amelia Gora, am one of Kamehameha's descendants/heirs through four (4) of his children; six (6) of his stepchildren; and two (2) of his hanai/adopted children.

Other members of the House of Nobles who were sued by the non-government entity, identity theft Territory of Hawaii turned State through Executive Order of U.S. President Eishenhower are also descendants/heirs of Kamehameha, Kalaniopuu, Kaumualii and his hanai/adopted children who were the descendants/heirs of John Young and Isaac Davis.

Genealogies of Interests through Bernice Pauahi Bishop, et. als. whose Trustees Cannot own Alodio/Ano Alodio Lands

Keawe was the son of John Kapena, Judge of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

Peke/Peke Davis was the daughter of Kamaikui/Grace Kamaikui and Isaac Davis. She was also the hanai/ adopted daughter of Kamehameha, John Young/Olohana, and Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.

David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva, Waihoioahu was also married to Kaheana and had stepchildren. Their father was Keo.

David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva, Waihoioahu was with/ married to Opunui's daughter Kapehe/Kapehe opio/Kapopo and had Mele Keawe/Keawepoo and David Keawe/Keawepoo. Opunui was son of Kekualoa (daughter of John Kapena) and Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.

Their great grandfather was Poonui of Maui.

David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva had hanai children named David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva/Waihoioahu opio who married Wahinealoha/ Meleana.

Wahinealoha/Meleana was previously married to others including Moo and John Booth son of saloon owner, Englishman named Joseph Booth. Joseph Booth was an Alien who could not own Alodio lands.

David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva had hanai children named Isaia/ Isaac/Isaac Waihoioahu and David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva/Waihoioahu opio who had a daughter/ hanai daughter named Mele Keawe documented in Liber 165 page 457.

Mele Keawe was married to David Nohola whose Guardian was George Lucas.

David Nohola was sent to Kalaupapa, Molokai.

Mele Keawe married Charles Kauweloa/Charles Williams/William Linekona Hokuloa the son of Opunui and Kalaikini who had been married to John Kapena, Judge of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Kalaikini was one of the children of Kuheleloa, son of Kauhi, descendant of Mataio Kekuanaoa, Hueu Davis, and Kamehameha.

Kalaikini was the Power of Attorney for Ruth Keelikolani before Charles Reed Bishop.

Kalaikini's son was adopted by her sister Kahananui.

Mele Keawe and Charles Kauweloa/Charles Williams/William Linekona Hokuloa had Mary Kauweloa and had Mary Kauweloa; siblings (names removed for privacy.)

Note: Mele Keawe was a recipient of a Trust and when she died everyone wondered what happened to the Trust monies. She was one of the heirs of Peke Davis, Hueu Davis and her earlier husband Noholoa.

Mary Kauweloa married Albert Castro and had children (names removed for privacy). She also divorced and married Cefereino Maduli and had children (names removed for privacy)

Mary Castro married John Gora who was also a Kamehameha, Kalaniopuu, Hueu Davis, Kalola - next of kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop on record - et. als. descendant/heir and had Amelia Gora,siblings.(names removed for privacy.)

************

Rents and Leases are Due for the Pehu, Keekapu, Kekuanaoa (other families involves our father's families and those descending from Paalua, the oldest son of Kekuanaoa, and his stepchildren John Kapena, Sam Kapena, and Umiokalani. An adopted son named John M. Kapena was a treasonous person documented. Nuuanu, et. als. Properties because we are the legal alodio/ano alodio title owners.

We are the alodio/ano alodio land owners and not the Aliens Fee Simple owners.

The KSBE/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates building sits on Pehu's property, Royal Patent 2691, Land Commission Award 685, Survey Notes, the "Greer Map", etc.asproof.

Pehu's lot was from Keekapu's parents named Honokaupu and her mother Kaneikaawa. Honokaupu's lot - Royal Patent 5705, Land Commission Award 243 is also shown on the "Greer Map" a short distance away the area where City Hall stands and the area where the yearly Santa Claus decorations are put up.

Pehu's and Keekapu's lands includes Fort Street Mall where Walmart stands, etc.

$500,000 per month for Royal Patent 2691 Land Commission Award 685, and the use of several offices/ a floor, for our records, etc.

The account that will be used for the purposes of the Rents/Leases are under my name: Amelia Gora, at the Bank of Hawaii Downtown branch.

I and other Royal Family members, descendants/heirs of David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva had hanai children named Isaia/ Isaac/Isaac Waihoioahu and David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva/Waihoioahu are the Landlords and will be the managers/overseers of the lands, buildings, listed for the Account.

The Bishop Estates Trustees, the U.S. Government, etc. could not inherit/own alodio/ano alodio lands because they were and are aliens.

Premeditation to take over a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation has been found by many researchers. Lands granted by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli were granted to the Royal Families.

Tampered documents have also been discovered because the Government buildings were closed for two (2)+ years which allowed the additions/removal of pertinent information. m

The following is part of the research for alodio/ano alodio titles:

Amelia Gora shared her post.

February 17 ·

important!

Amelia Gora added 3 new photos.

February 17 ·

found the frauds..."obtain an allodial title in fee simple" vs. Kamehameha Ill "alodio" for kanaka maoli and "fee simple" for ALIENS! refs,..Indices of Land Commission Awards (1929) and Kamehameha III speech of 1851

Amelia Gora added 3 new photos.

Monies shall be deposited in the account with an email and a Posted letter showing that payment has been submitted at the Bank of Hawaii Downtown branch.

According to HAWAII REPORTS, Volume 6, page 758, the "Land lord's claim for rent is a lien and has priority over ordinary debts."

Failure to pay will result in eviction for your entity which cannot own Alodio/Ano Alodio lands, etc.

Have a Good Day!

Sincerely,

Amelia Gora, descendant of David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva who had hanai children named Isaia/ Isaac/Isaac Waihoioahu and David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva/Waihoioahu opio heir of Keekapu, Pehu et. als., a Royal person, Royal Family member, One of our Royal Families Representatives, Landlord of record, Private Property owner, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles, Judicial Tribunal member, Hawaiian Genealogical Society Representative

p.s. The above is for RP2691, there are many other properties owned by our families including those leased out to Andy Anderson, and others. Rents and leases are also due for RP1125; RP5667; RP2540; RP1270, RP2280 Royal Hawaiian Shopping Center, etc.

Due date for the above billing is in 30 days or July 10, 2016 and other lands rents and leases will be due by July 31, 2016. A listing of the other lands will be forthcoming.

References:

http://theiolani.blogspot.com/2016/06/vol-v-no-601-legal-notice-718...

theiolani.blogspot.com 606 issues posted

http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037

Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates Trustees

U.S. President Obama, et. als.

Greetings,

My name is Amelia Gora, one of the Royal Family members of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

Alodio/Ano Alodio lands are our legal claims.

The KSBE/Kamehameha Schools, Trustees are Not related to our Royal Families who have the prima facie documents of superior titles to many of the lands in the Hawaiian Islands.

Reference: 1851 Speech of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli regarding alodio and Fee Simple lands to Aliens, etc.; theiolani.blogspot.comhttp:myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037 etc.

This letter is to inform you that the lands of Pehu and Keekapu has owners and rents and leases are due to Keekapu's last husband named David W. Pauahi/DW Pauahi/DW Kalua/DW Keawe/Davis Keawe/David Sylva, Waihoioahu son of Keawe and Peke/ Peke Davis, who was her sole heir.